← Home · Geophysics

Seismic Tomography Surveys in Long Beach: Subsurface Velocity Models for ASCE 7 Compliance

Together, we solve the challenges of tomorrow.

LEARN MORE →

Long Beach poses a distinct geotechnical challenge that separates it from other Southern California cities: the deep sedimentary fill of the Los Angeles Basin meets the active Wilmington Anticline and the notoriously seismogenic Newport-Inglewood Fault, which ruptured catastrophically in 1933. ASCE 7-22 Chapter 20 requires a defensible site class determination, and when surface geology is complicated by artificial fill over Holocene alluvium—common across the port and downtown districts—borehole data alone cannot resolve lateral velocity contrasts that control site amplification. Our laboratory deploys seismic tomography using both refraction and reflection acquisition geometries to deliver P-wave and S-wave velocity cross-sections that feed directly into the site-specific ground motion analysis required by IBC 2024. The signal penetration routinely reaches 30 to 50 meters in the compacted sands beneath the Terminal Island Freeway corridor, which is critical because the impedance boundary between Quaternary deposits and the underlying Pico Formation varies sharply across less than 200 meters in some locations. We couple the tomographic inversion with a MASW survey when the client needs a continuous Vs profile for site classification, and we integrate seismic refraction data when the project demands a higher-resolution bedrock depth map under proposed heavy structures.

A 24-channel refraction tomogram across the Wilmington Anticline captured a 40-percent velocity jump over 30 meters—a lateral gradient that a standard borehole grid would have missed entirely.

How we work

The port expansion of the 1920s and the oil boom that dotted Signal Hill with derricks left Long Beach with a subsurface mosaic of hydraulically placed fills, abandoned well casings, and undocumented backfill zones that frustrate conventional geotechnical characterization. Seismic tomography cuts through this noise because the method images the bulk material stiffness directly, rather than inferring it from discrete samples. Our field crew typically lays out 24- to 48-channel spreads with 4.5 Hz geophones at 2-meter spacing, using a weight-drop source for shallow targets under 15 meters and a buffalo gun when the investigation depth must exceed 40 meters—essential for the deep basin effects mapped by the USGS in the Long Beach 7.5-minute quadrangle. The refraction tomogram reveals compressional velocities that we convert to shear-wave velocity using calibrated Poisson's ratios derived from downhole measurements in the same geologic unit. For reflection surveys, we process the data through a standard NMO stack and pre-stack depth migration workflow, which helps identify the top of the Pico Formation reflector that dips gently southwest at roughly 4 degrees. Pairing this with CPT testing at key tie points lets us constrain the velocity-to-tip-resistance correlation and reduce the non-uniqueness inherent in any geophysical inversion, producing a ground model that the structural engineer can use directly in a site response analysis package like DEEPSOIL.
Seismic Tomography Surveys in Long Beach: Subsurface Velocity Models for ASCE 7 Compliance
Technical reference image — Long Beach

Local geotechnical context

The contrast between the Belmont Shore spit and the inland Signal Hill uplift tells the whole story of seismic risk in Long Beach. Belmont Shore sits on loose beach and dune sands with a water table often above 8 feet depth, where Vs30 values can fall below 200 m/s and liquefaction potential extends through the upper 12 meters—a Site Class F scenario under ASCE 7 if not mitigated. Just three miles northeast, Signal Hill exposes the Repetto and Pico Formations at the surface, with Vs30 exceeding 600 m/s and a Site Class C classification that produces fundamentally different spectral accelerations. Between these two extremes, the downtown core and the Port of Long Beach lie on artificial fill placed during the 1940s harbor expansion, where undocumented thickness variations create a velocity structure that cannot be reliably categorized through site class alone. Seismic tomography bridges this gap by mapping the shear-wave velocity field in two dimensions, allowing the geotechnical engineer to identify pockets of low-velocity material that would amplify ground motion at periods matching mid-rise structures. The 1933 Long Beach earthquake demonstrated that surface geology controls damage patterns more than epicentral distance, and a liquefaction assessment integrated with a tomographic Vs profile gives the structural designer a defensible basis for ground improvement decisions.

Need a geotechnical assessment?

Reply within 24h.

Email: info@geotechnicalengineering1.com

Video overview

Technical data

ParameterTypical value
Source type (shallow/deep)Sledgehammer & plate / Buffalo gun (8-gauge)
Geophone frequency4.5 Hz (vertical component), 10 Hz triaxial for S-wave
Typical spread length48 to 115 meters, 24-48 channels
Investigation depth (refraction)15 to 60 meters, depending on source energy
Reflection CDP fold12- to 24-fold, 1-meter station spacing
Inversion algorithmTravel-time tomography with gradient-based smoothness constraints
Vs30 reporting standardPer ASCE 7-22 Section 20.4, time-averaged to 30 m
Output deliverable2D velocity cross-section, DXF/PDF, SEG-Y raw data

Related services

01

2D Refraction Tomography for Site Classification and Bedrock Mapping

A multi-shot refraction survey processed through travel-time tomography to produce a continuous P-wave and S-wave velocity cross-section. We deploy a 48-channel spread with overlapping shot points to achieve a minimum ray coverage of 12 hits per cell in the inversion mesh, resulting in a velocity model with resolution on the order of 2 meters vertically and 5 meters horizontally. The final report includes the Vs30 calculation per ASCE 7-22, the 2D velocity section in PDF and DXF, and the raw SEG-Y files for independent reprocessing if the project peer reviewer requests it. This configuration is suited for mid-rise developments on the Alamitos Bay fill and for bridge foundation studies along the Los Angeles River channel.

02

High-Resolution Reflection Profiling for Deep Basin Structure

A shallow seismic reflection survey using a 24-geophone spread, single geophone per station, and a buffalo gun source to image reflectors down to 60-80 meters depth. We process the data through a standard CMP workflow including elevation statics, NMO correction, and post-stack Kirchhoff migration to resolve the interface between Quaternary basin fill and the Pico Formation. This service targets projects where the depth to the seismic impedance contrast controls the site period and where the USGS basin amplification factors in the San Pedro Basin require site-specific verification. The deliverable includes a migrated time section, a depth-converted profile using stacking velocities calibrated with nearby borehole data, and a technical memo interpreting the key reflectors in terms of the regional stratigraphic column.

Relevant standards

ASCE/SEI 7-22 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, IBC 2024 Chapter 16 (Structural Design) and Chapter 18 (Soils and Foundations), ASTM D5777-18 Standard Guide for Using the Seismic Refraction Method for Subsurface Investigation, ASTM D7128-18 Standard Guide for Using the Seismic-Reflection Method for Shallow Subsurface Investigation, ASTM D7400-19 Standard Test Methods for Downhole Seismic Testing

Common questions

What is the typical cost range for a seismic refraction tomography survey in Long Beach?

For a standard 48-meter spread with 24 geophones and a sledgehammer source, the cost ranges from US$2,960 to US$5,120 depending on the number of shot points, the required depth of investigation, and whether S-wave data acquisition is included. Projects requiring a buffalo gun source for deeper penetration or reflection processing add to the upper end of the range. All proposals include the full inversion report, Vs30 calculation, and raw data files.

How does seismic tomography compare to a standard MASW survey for site classification?

MASW yields a 1D shear-wave velocity profile beneath the center of the array, which is adequate for a uniform site. Seismic tomography provides a 2D velocity cross-section that reveals lateral velocity gradients, buried channels, and pinch-outs that a 1D method averages out. In Long Beach, where the fill thickness can change sharply across an old pier line or a buried stream channel, the 2D result prevents misclassification that could lead to an unconservative design spectrum.

Can the survey be performed on a congested urban site with limited access?

Yes, we routinely work in downtown Long Beach and the port area with constrained access. We use a land streamer configuration when pavement is present—a towed array of geophones mounted on base plates that couple through asphalt—which eliminates the need to plant individual geophones. For sites with underground utilities, we coordinate with DigAlert and can adjust the spread geometry to avoid known utility corridors while maintaining adequate ray coverage in the zone of interest.

What deliverables does the structural engineer receive for a seismic design package?

The engineering package includes the processed 2D P-wave and S-wave velocity cross-sections with annotated lithologic interpretation, the calculated Vs30 value and corresponding ASCE 7-22 Site Class, a technical report describing the acquisition parameters and inversion methodology, and the digital velocity model as a CSV grid for direct input into site response software. If reflection data are acquired, we also provide the depth-converted seismic section with interpreted horizons tied to the regional stratigraphy of the Los Angeles Basin.

Location and service area

We serve projects in Long Beach and surrounding areas.

View larger map